American Council on Science and Health American Council on Science and Health
About
ACSH
¥ Contact
ACSH
¥ Support
ACSH
¥ My
ACSH
¥ Advanced
Search
 
ACSH.org   Home   . .   Health Issues   . .   News Center   . .   Publications   . .   Events   . .   FactsAndFears   .  

Health Facts And Fears

Archives >

Printer Format icon Printer Format
E-mail Information icon E-mail Information
July 1, 2004

Egg Story Unscrambled

By Ruth Kava, Ph.D., R.D.

For over twenty years, eggs have been considered dietary demons by many because of their high cholesterol content.  Since high levels of cholesterol in the blood have been linked to an increased risk of heart disease, the thinking was that limiting dietary cholesterol by limiting egg consumption would be a step in the right direction.  Current dietary recommendations are to restrict cholesterol intake to 300 milligrams per day—one large egg yolk contains about 213 milligrams—to decrease the risk of heart disease.  But, as with most simple solutions to complex problems, this egg-phobic approach is incorrect.

First of all, the response of blood cholesterol to dietary cholesterol intake varies widely among individuals.  The majority of people don't become hypercholesterolemic when consuming eggs or other sources of cholesterol.  Second, we know a lot more now about blood cholesterol levels and how they're controlled than we did even ten years ago, and it's more complicated than we thought.

Most people interested in the topic of cholesterol levels and heart disease know (or have heard of) the different forms in which cholesterol is carried in the blood.  The particles known as high-density lipoproteins (HDL) are considered the "good" cholesterol because they do not seem to form the artery-clogging deposits called plaques.  On the other hand, the low-density lipoproteins (LDL) are known as "bad" cholesterol because these are the particles that seem most likely to form arterial plaques.

LDL ("bad") levels do increase for some folks when they consume a lot of dietary cholesterol—so they should stay away from or limit eggs, right?  That's not so clear anymore either, as suggested by a recent article in the scientific journal Metabolism.1  The study looked at the effect of high or low consumption of cholesterol from eggs on different sized LDL particles—yes, there are even subdivisions of LDL.

It turns out that the bigger the LDL particles, the less risk they pose of artery clogging, which sounds counter-intuitive.  But it seems that it's the smaller, more dense LDLs that actually penetrate the artery walls, which is where plaque formation occurs.

The researchers fed forty men and fifty-one premenopausal women either the equivalent of three whole eggs per day (640mg of cholesterol) or a placebo for thirty days.  Then the people went back to their regular diets for three weeks, and then went on the other diet for another thirty days.  Some of the experimental subjects were hyperresponders—that is, for every 100mg increase in dietary cholesterol, their total blood cholesterol increased by at least 2.5mg/100cc of blood (total cholesterol is cholesterol in all the various particles—LDL, HDL, and others).

The interesting result was that although the hyperresponders' LDL levels did increase after the high-cholesterol part of the study, the increase was seen in the largest and presumably least artery-clogging LDL particles.  This response was more pronounced in women than men.

The take-home lesson?  Well, this was just one study, and its results must be replicated by others before we can be comfortable that they are generally applicable.  But it certainly suggests that the old admonitions to avoid eggs will not necessarily help prevent heart disease in most people—even those whose "bad" cholesterol increases when they eat eggs.  And this is good news, since eggs provide myriad nutrients besides cholesterol, and can make important nutritional contributions to the daily diet.  For more information about eggs, see ACSH's publications The Role of Eggs in the Diet and What's the Story? Eggs.

1 Herron KL, Lofgren IE, Sharman M, Volek JS, Fernandez ML.  High intake of cholesterol results in less atherogenic low-density lipoprotein particles in men and women independent of response classification. 2004; Metabolism 53(6):823-830.


Drawing of Todd Seavey


About the Editor:
Todd Seavey

is Director of Publications at ACSH and edits FactsAndFears.  His opinions are not necessarily ACSH's.

He can be reached at seavey [at] acsh.org.

Subscribe to ACSH.org RSS  FactsAndFears posts on YOUR site
Search Archives Icon for Search
Search

Icon for Browse Archives Browse Archives

Sign In Icon for Sign In

Username:

Password:

Sign In Now >>

Forget your password?

Register

Why register with ACSH?
You'll be able to:
¥ Post comments to articles
¥ Subscribe to e-bulletin
¥ Receive immediate or scheduled updates


Register Now >>

¥ (from ACSH) theScooponSmoking.org
¥ aBetterEarth.org
¥ AgBioWorld
¥ American Justice Partnership
¥ Anti-Quackery and Science Blog
¥ Anti-Quackery Ring
¥ BiomonitoringInfo.org
¥ Blogborygmi.com (Nick Gene & co.)
¥ CalorieLab
¥ The Cancer Blog
¥ CAST on transgenic animals
¥ Catallarchy (econ, etc.)
¥ Competitive Enterprise Institute
¥ Consumer Guide to Bariatric Surgery
¥ ConsumerFreedom.com
¥ Debunkers.org
¥ Diet-Blog.com
¥ Dynamist/Virginia Postrel
¥ Fishscam
¥ Freakonomics
¥ GruntDoc
¥ Health Beat (medical news/research)
¥ Health Business Blog
¥ Health Intelligence Network blog
¥ In the Pipeline (drugs per Derek Lowe)
¥ Infography on Medical Care: Quacks, Quackery
¥ Institute of Ideas
¥ JunkScience.com (Steve Milloy)
¥ MedMusings
¥ National Council Against Health Fraud
¥ New Doctor
¥ Overlawyered.com
¥ ParkinsonsHealth
¥ Quackbusters
¥ Quackfiles
¥ Quackfiles.blogspot.com
¥ Quackwatch
¥ James Randi, ultimate skeptic
¥ Rangel, M.D.
¥ Reason (including Seavey pieces)
¥ SAGEcrossroads.net (aging)
¥ Scientific Review of Alternative Medicine
¥ Science Media Centre
¥ Sense About Science
¥ Skeptic Magazine
¥ Skeptic Ring
¥ Skeptical Inquirer/CSICOP
¥ Spiked-Online
¥ TCS Daily (Europe)
¥ TCS Daily (U.S.)
¥ 3 Billion and Counting (malaria docu. w/Ross)
¥ Tobacco Survivors United
¥ TobaccoAnalysis blog
¥ Urban Legends per Snopes
¥ US News Best Health Heart Center
¥ US News Lung Cancer Center
¥ Volokh.com (blog on law, econ, polisci)
¥ Washington Legal Foundation
¥ WhyBiotech (Council for Biotechnology Info.)
¥ WhyQuit.com (case studies, message boards, etc.)
¥ Dr. Carl Winter (health song-parodies)
¥ aWorldConnected.org (benefits of globalization)


TO VIEW AND MAKE COMMENTS ON THE ARTICLES ABOVE (OR OTHERS), "SIGN IN" AT THE RIGHT MARGIN.

AMERICAN COUNCIL ON SCIENCE AND HEALTH  |  1995 BROADWAY, 2ND FLOOR, NEW YORK, NY 10023-5860
TELEPHONE: (212) 362-7044  |  FAX: (212) 362-4919  |  E-MAIL: GEN. ORGANIZATION MAILBOX: acsh (at) acsh.org; IND. STAFFER: [last name or last name followed by first initial]@acsh.org 

Copyright © 1997-2004 American Council on Science and Health  |  Privacy Policy  |  All Rights Reserved
.

Founded in 1978, ACSH is a consumer advocacy organization directed and advised by over 350 physicians, scientists and policy advisors. ACSH promotes the use of sound, peer-reviewed science in the formation of a full  spectrum of  public health policies, including those related to food, pharmaceuticals, environmental chemicals, lifestyle factors, consumer products and terrorism preparedness and response.