American Council on Science and Health American Council on Science and Health
About
ACSH
¥ Contact
ACSH
¥ Support
ACSH
¥ My
ACSH
¥ Advanced
Search
 
ACSH.org   Home   . .   Health Issues   . .   News Center   . .   Publications   . .   Events   . .   FactsAndFears   .  

Health Facts And Fears

Archives >

Printer Format icon Printer Format
E-mail Information icon E-mail Information
April 21, 2005

Some Padding May Be Healthful, According to New Study

By Ruth Kava, Ph.D., R.D.

Obesity has been much touted in some quarters as being a leading cause of preventable death in the United States, second only to smoking. About a year ago, a study published by researchers at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimated the number of excess deaths attributable to obesity at 400,000, a value later corrected to 365,000. (1) Publication of these figures created quite a stir, and gave impetus to the drive by health professionals and others to encourage Americans to revise their lifestyles -- especially to eat less and move more.

These numbers have now been disputed by results of other CDC research, which substantially ratcheted down the estimate of excess weight-attributable deaths to "only" 25,814. This estimate dropped overweight/obesity from the number 2 to number 7 most-frequent preventable cause of death in the U.S. (2)

Why such a great discrepancy? First, the two groups did not employ the same data. The most recent study used data from three National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) -- from 1971-75, 1976-80, and 1988-94 -- while the first did not. These are nationally representative samples that involve weighing and measuring participants -- that is, they don't just rely on self-reported data. Second, they used somewhat different statistical methods.

The second group found that while obesity per se (a Body Mass Index or BMI* score above 30) increased the risk of death compared to normal weight individuals (BMI between 18.5 and 25), the great majority of these deaths occurred in people who were excessively obese (BMI > 35), and primarily in people under seventy years old.

Perhaps the most interesting finding was that people who were considered overweight (BMI between 25 and 30) had a decreased rather than an increased risk of death. In other words, the data give the impression that overweight status confers some protection against premature mortality. This decrease partially accounted for the much smaller impact of excess weight than in other studies.

For those who were overweight but not obese, there were about 86,094 fewer deaths in 2000 than were expected (that is, relative to normal weight individuals). For people in the obese category, there were 111, 909 estimated excess deaths. Thus, for the combined category of overweight and obesity, the researchers estimated that there were 25,814 excess deaths.

A probable factor in the unexpected decrease in mortality in those considered overweight, but not obese, might be confounding by body composition -- a possibility noted by the CDC researchers. While BMI is generally used as an index of fatness, it doesn't distinguish between body fat and lean tissue (for a more detailed explanation, see http://www.acsh.org/factsfears/newsID.517/news_detail.asp). People who exercise regularly and have gained additional muscle mass could have a BMI that would put them in the overweight range, but would not be expected to have a higher risk of early death.

So, does this mean that a little extra padding is a good thing? Not necessarily. This study examined only mortality -- excess deaths. There was no evaluation of morbidity, or illnesses associated with obesity. Although overweight and somewhat obese people were less likely to die than previously thought, this doesn't mean they were healthier or that their quality of life was as good or better than that of slimmer people.

While overweight may not increase the risk of dying prematurely, based on this study we can't say that it doesn't have a negative impact on quality of life.

We also know from both this and other studies that the number of obese individuals is increasing most rapidly for the group with a BMI over 35 -- the most extreme group. And for this group, the mortality rate was indeed increased. Thus, as with a number of other factors, the effect of body fat on mortality is dose-dependent: a little more may be helpful, but a lot extra is not.

(1)Mokdad AH, Marks JS, Stroup DF, Gerberding JL. Actual causes of death in the United States, 2000. JAMA 2004;291:1238-1245. [Published correction appeared in JAMA 2005;293:298.]
(2)Flegal KM, Graubard BI, Williamson DF, Gail MH. Excess deaths associated with underweight, overweight and obesity. JAMA 2005;293:1861-1867.

*BMI = weight in pounds X 703 divided by height in inches X height in inches.

Ruth Kava, Ph.D., R.D., is Director of Nutrition at the American Council on Science and Health.

 


Drawing of Todd Seavey


About the Editor:
Todd Seavey

is Director of Publications at ACSH and edits FactsAndFears.  His opinions are not necessarily ACSH's.

He can be reached at seavey [at] acsh.org.

Subscribe to ACSH.org RSS  FactsAndFears posts on YOUR site
Search Archives Icon for Search
Search

Icon for Browse Archives Browse Archives

Sign In Icon for Sign In

Username:

Password:

Sign In Now >>

Forget your password?

Register

Why register with ACSH?
You'll be able to:
¥ Post comments to articles
¥ Subscribe to e-bulletin
¥ Receive immediate or scheduled updates


Register Now >>

¥ (from ACSH) theScooponSmoking.org
¥ aBetterEarth.org
¥ AgBioWorld
¥ American Justice Partnership
¥ Anti-Quackery and Science Blog
¥ Anti-Quackery Ring
¥ BiomonitoringInfo.org
¥ Blogborygmi.com (Nick Gene & co.)
¥ CalorieLab
¥ The Cancer Blog
¥ CAST on transgenic animals
¥ Catallarchy (econ, etc.)
¥ Competitive Enterprise Institute
¥ ConsumerFreedom.com
¥ Debunkers.org
¥ Diet-Blog.com
¥ Dynamist/Virginia Postrel
¥ Fishscam
¥ Freakonomics
¥ GruntDoc
¥ Health Beat (medical news/research)
¥ Health Business Blog
¥ Health Intelligence Network blog
¥ In the Pipeline (drugs per Derek Lowe)
¥ Infography on Medical Care: Quacks, Quackery
¥ Institute of Ideas
¥ JunkScience.com (Steve Milloy)
¥ MedMusings
¥ National Council Against Health Fraud
¥ Overlawyered.com
¥ ParkinsonsHealth
¥ Quackbusters
¥ Quackfiles
¥ Quackfiles.blogspot.com
¥ Quackwatch
¥ James Randi, ultimate skeptic
¥ Rangel, M.D.
¥ Reason (including Seavey pieces)
¥ SAGEcrossroads.net (aging)
¥ Scientific Review of Alternative Medicine
¥ Science Media Centre
¥ Sense About Science
¥ Skeptic Magazine
¥ Skeptic Ring
¥ Skeptical Inquirer/CSICOP
¥ Spiked-Online
¥ TCS Daily (Europe)
¥ TCS Daily (U.S.)
¥ 3 Billion and Counting (malaria docu. w/Ross)
¥ Tobacco Survivors United
¥ TobaccoAnalysis blog
¥ Urban Legends per Snopes
¥ US News Best Health Heart Center
¥ US News Lung Cancer Center
¥ Volokh.com (blog on law, econ, polisci)
¥ Washington Legal Foundation
¥ WhyBiotech (Council for Biotechnology Info.)
¥ WhyQuit.com (case studies, message boards, etc.)
¥ Dr. Carl Winter (health song-parodies)
¥ aWorldConnected.org (benefits of globalization)


TO VIEW AND MAKE COMMENTS ON THE ARTICLES ABOVE (OR OTHERS), "SIGN IN" AT THE RIGHT MARGIN.

AMERICAN COUNCIL ON SCIENCE AND HEALTH  |  1995 BROADWAY, 2ND FLOOR, NEW YORK, NY 10023-5860
TELEPHONE: (212) 362-7044  |  FAX: (212) 362-4919  |  E-MAIL: GEN. ORGANIZATION MAILBOX: acsh (at) acsh.org; IND. STAFFER: [last name or last name followed by first initial]@acsh.org 

Copyright © 1997-2004 American Council on Science and Health  |  Privacy Policy  |  All Rights Reserved
.

Founded in 1978, ACSH is a consumer advocacy organization directed and advised by over 350 physicians, scientists and policy advisors. ACSH promotes the use of sound, peer-reviewed science in the formation of a full  spectrum of  public health policies, including those related to food, pharmaceuticals, environmental chemicals, lifestyle factors, consumer products and terrorism preparedness and response.