American Council on Science and Health American Council on Science and Health
About
ACSH
¥ Contact
ACSH
¥ Support
ACSH
¥ My
ACSH
¥ Advanced
Search
 
ACSH.org   Home   . .   Health Issues   . .   News Center   . .   Publications   . .   Events   . .   FactsAndFears   .  

Health Facts And Fears

Archives >

Printer Format icon Printer Format
E-mail Information icon E-mail Information
August 8, 2005

Florida Mom Calls For End of Vaccinations

By Mara Burney

We might expect concerned parents to live by slogans like: "Love them, protect them, tell them about the dangers of smoking" or "Love them, protect them, make them wear their seatbelts" or "Love them, protect them, keep them away from guns."  But love them, protect them, never get them vaccinated?  Huh?

Wendy Callahan, a concerned mother from Hawthorne, FL, has purchased billboard space in Marion County, where she has erected a huge sign urging parents to "Love Them, Protect Them, Never Inject Them."  The billboard, which Callahan hopes to leave up for an entire year, claims that vaccines can cause autism, chronic ear infections, and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome.  Unfortunately, the mere suggestion of risk can have a very profound effect on people's choices.  If the current media blitz continues, parents may be left with the impression that their children are safer if left unvaccinated, and this dangerous misinformation could lead to a resurgence of deadly pathogens which are currently kept at bay by immunization (see ACSH's booklet Vaccinations: What Parents Need to Know).

These predictions are not simply hypothetical.  In 1974, Japan had completely eliminated deaths from pertussis (whooping cough), with only 393 cases reported that year for the entire country.  However, as is happening today, rumors began to spread that the vaccine was unsafe, and within a few years the number of infants receiving the vaccine plummeted from 80% to 10%.  In 1979, a major pertussis epidemic ensued, with 13,000 cases nationwide resulting in 113 deaths over the next three years.  Realizing that they had made a mistake when they discontinued the vaccine, the Japanese Ministry of Health reinstituted it in 1981, and the number of cases dropped again.(1)

When public health officials say that vaccines are "safe," they do not mean that they are entirely risk-free.  But as with any medical intervention, the benefits and risks must be weighed.  For instance, the Hepatitis B (HBV) vaccine carries a risk of anaphylaxis (severe allergic reaction) of 1 in 600,000.(2)  But compare this to the 1.2 million deaths per year worldwide that result from HBV infections, and it becomes clear that to forego an HBV vaccination would be unwise.(3)  The same can be said of diphtheria, measles, and other diseases.  In other words, vaccines do carry some small risk, but the benefits of receiving them (both for individual health and for population health) are orders of magnitude greater. 

Recent concerns about the safety of vaccines seem to center on two perceived risks.  The first and most widely discussed is thimerosal, a vaccine preservative.  There is no sound evidence linking thimerosal to autism or any other disease.  Even so, it has been eliminated from most childhood vaccines as a precaution, and the last remaining stocks of thimerosal-containing products were due to expire in 2003.  A second concern that many parents have is that the bacterial or viral components themselves in the vaccines may make children sick, especially since so many vaccines are given together in the first few years of life.  However, infants are exposed to tens of thousands of new bacteria and viruses after birth, so the amount contained in the eleven recommended vaccines is miniscule when put in perspective.  In fact, the Vaccine Center of the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia estimates that an infant would have to receive about 10,000 vaccines to overwhelm its immune system!(4)

Successful vaccination programs in the U.S. have all but eliminated diseases such as measles, polio, and Hib meningitis, which used to cause thousands of deaths and disabilities each year.  Hopefully parents with concerns will go to their pediatricians for advice, because the proven benefits of vaccines are too numerous to place on one billboard.

1 http://www.cdc.gov/nip/publications/fs/gen/Why.htm
http://www.chop.edu/consumer/jsp/division/generic.jsp?id=75743
2 http://www.chop.edu/consumer/jsp/division/generic.jsp?id=75743
3 http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/471470_1
4 http://www.chop.edu/consumer/jsp/division/generic.jsp?id=75743


Mara Burney is a research associate at the American Council on Science and Health (ACSH.org, HealthFactsAndFears.com).

Visitor Responses

Dr. Mick (August 10, 2005)

It's interesting that the same dogma continues to be perpetuated with regard to the controversial vaccination program. Before I continue, I am for informed consent, I believe both sides of the this argument should be taken into account equally before one injects the most lethal toxins known to man into their infants. The facts that I believe people should be aware of is that, first and foremost, no research comparing non-vaccinated individuals to vaccinated individuals has ever been performed in the United States. Longitudinal studies for vaccine reaction are also hard to find. For example, The Hep B Vaccine by Engerix-B. The insert states that all subjects were monitored for 4 days post-administration. But, Shouldn't the most basic question of all be answered; are vaccinated Children healthier that the unvaccinated? Here are a couple of studies that are from well respected peer-read reviews: One study compared DPT (or DTP) and non-DTP vaccinated children. 23.1% of the immunized children had asthma episodes and 30% had other allergic illnesses. The Non-immunized had 0% (none!) asthma or other allergic illness. Kemp T, Pearce N, Fitzharris P et al. Is infant immunization a risk factor for childhood asthma or allergy? Epidemiology. 1997;8:678-680. In another study, 10.69% of children immunized with pertussis had asthma while 1.97% of those not immunized with pertussis had asthma. There were 3 cases of asthma among the 112 who had no pertussis shots but received other vaccinations. Among the 91 children who had no vaccinations at all (yet) there was 1 case of asthma. Odent ME, Culpin EE, Kimmel T. Pertussis Vaccination and asthma: Is there a link? JAMA. 1994;272(8):593. The other problem is that doctors under-report vaccine reactions; 1 in 50 vaccine reactions reported to VAERS. Froeschle J. Connaught Laboratories. Adverse events associated with childhood vaccines, evidence bearing on causality. IOM presentation. May 11, 1992. Washington, DC:328, appendix B. Have you seen the graphs that exist from International Mortality Statistics, 1981. There are numerous graphs that show NO link between the decline of these diseases and immunization. In fact, 98% of Measles had been eradicated before mass immunization was implemented. Source: Neil Z. Miller- Vaccines are they really safe and effective. Similar declines are noted with regard to Pertussis, Polio, etc. In conclusion, before you call concerned parents nuts for wanting to stop mass immunization, know that this is just a minute amount of research that exists which calls into question the necessity for vaccination. Yours in Optimal Health, Dr. Mick


Drawing of Todd Seavey


About the Editor:
Todd Seavey

is Director of Publications at ACSH and edits FactsAndFears.  His opinions are not necessarily ACSH's.

He can be reached at seavey [at] acsh.org.

Subscribe to ACSH.org RSS  FactsAndFears posts on YOUR site
Search Archives Icon for Search
Search

Icon for Browse Archives Browse Archives

Sign In Icon for Sign In

Username:

Password:

Sign In Now >>

Forget your password?

Register

Why register with ACSH?
You'll be able to:
¥ Post comments to articles
¥ Subscribe to e-bulletin
¥ Receive immediate or scheduled updates


Register Now >>

¥ (from ACSH) theScooponSmoking.org
¥ aBetterEarth.org
¥ AgBioWorld
¥ American Justice Partnership
¥ Anti-Quackery and Science Blog
¥ Anti-Quackery Ring
¥ BiomonitoringInfo.org
¥ Blogborygmi.com (Nick Gene & co.)
¥ CalorieLab
¥ The Cancer Blog
¥ CAST on transgenic animals
¥ Catallarchy (econ, etc.)
¥ Competitive Enterprise Institute
¥ Consumer Guide to Bariatric Surgery
¥ ConsumerFreedom.com
¥ Debunkers.org
¥ Diet-Blog.com
¥ Dynamist/Virginia Postrel
¥ Fishscam
¥ Freakonomics
¥ GruntDoc
¥ Health Beat (medical news/research)
¥ Health Business Blog
¥ Health Intelligence Network blog
¥ In the Pipeline (drugs per Derek Lowe)
¥ Infography on Medical Care: Quacks, Quackery
¥ Institute of Ideas
¥ JunkScience.com (Steve Milloy)
¥ MedMusings
¥ National Council Against Health Fraud
¥ New Doctor
¥ Overlawyered.com
¥ ParkinsonsHealth
¥ Quackbusters
¥ Quackfiles
¥ Quackfiles.blogspot.com
¥ Quackwatch
¥ James Randi, ultimate skeptic
¥ Rangel, M.D.
¥ Reason (including Seavey pieces)
¥ SAGEcrossroads.net (aging)
¥ Scientific Review of Alternative Medicine
¥ Science Media Centre
¥ Sense About Science
¥ Skeptic Magazine
¥ Skeptic Ring
¥ Skeptical Inquirer/CSICOP
¥ Spiked-Online
¥ TCS Daily (Europe)
¥ TCS Daily (U.S.)
¥ 3 Billion and Counting (malaria docu. w/Ross)
¥ Tobacco Survivors United
¥ TobaccoAnalysis blog
¥ Urban Legends per Snopes
¥ US News Best Health Heart Center
¥ US News Lung Cancer Center
¥ Volokh.com (blog on law, econ, polisci)
¥ Washington Legal Foundation
¥ WhyBiotech (Council for Biotechnology Info.)
¥ WhyQuit.com (case studies, message boards, etc.)
¥ Dr. Carl Winter (health song-parodies)
¥ aWorldConnected.org (benefits of globalization)


TO VIEW AND MAKE COMMENTS ON THE ARTICLES ABOVE (OR OTHERS), "SIGN IN" AT THE RIGHT MARGIN.

AMERICAN COUNCIL ON SCIENCE AND HEALTH  |  1995 BROADWAY, 2ND FLOOR, NEW YORK, NY 10023-5860
TELEPHONE: (212) 362-7044  |  FAX: (212) 362-4919  |  E-MAIL: GEN. ORGANIZATION MAILBOX: acsh (at) acsh.org; IND. STAFFER: [last name or last name followed by first initial]@acsh.org 

Copyright © 1997-2004 American Council on Science and Health  |  Privacy Policy  |  All Rights Reserved
.

Founded in 1978, ACSH is a consumer advocacy organization directed and advised by over 350 physicians, scientists and policy advisors. ACSH promotes the use of sound, peer-reviewed science in the formation of a full  spectrum of  public health policies, including those related to food, pharmaceuticals, environmental chemicals, lifestyle factors, consumer products and terrorism preparedness and response.