American Council on Science and Health American Council on Science and Health
About
ACSH
¥ Contact
ACSH
¥ Support
ACSH
¥ My
ACSH
¥ Advanced
Search
 
ACSH.org   Home   . .   Health Issues   . .   News Center   . .   Publications   . .   Events   . .   FactsAndFears   .  

Health Facts And Fears

Archives >

Printer Format icon Printer Format
E-mail Information icon E-mail Information
February 8, 2006

Confusing Times for Depressed Pregnant Women--and Their Doctors

By Gilbert Ross, M.D.

Three new studies make the treatment of pregnant women suffering from depression somewhat more complicated.

Depression is common among women of childbearing age, with perhaps 10-15% of women suffering from it at some point in their childbearing years. Contrary to common belief, pregnancy has been shown not to protect women against its ravages. Thankfully, effective anti-depressive therapy has been available for many years, and it keeps getting better: while older tricyclic drugs still remain useful in certain circumstances, the newer SSRIs (such as Prozac, Paxil, Celexa, and Zoloft) are at least as beneficial and free of some of the worst side effects of the older drugs.

Now, in the Feb. 1 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association, a group of researchers from Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School report that, in a group of women with major depression who discontinued their anti-depression medications during pregnancy, over two-thirds (68%) experienced a relapse of their affective disorder. Among those who did not stop their therapy, only one-quarter flared during pregnancy. Thus, those who stopped their medication were two and a half times more likely to relapse. One-half of those who did relapse -- either on or off their medications -- experienced their renewed symptoms during the first three months (first trimester) of pregnancy. It is important to note that depression during pregnancy, besides the obvious risk to the mother of poor nutrition and self-destructive behavior, has direct adverse effects on the fetus and newborn as well, including low birth weight and slowed development. Their conclusion: pregnancy does not protect against an exacerbation of untreated depression. Cessation of medication during pregnancy is associated with a high risk of relapse. The treatment approach seems straightforward: don't stop anti-depressive therapy in pregnant women unless clearly necessary. But not so fast...

Another study, released this week in the Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, finds that almost one-third of infants born to mothers on SSRI antidepressants at or near term experienced withdrawal symptoms -- neonatal abstinence syndrome, or NAS. This syndrome is characterized by high-pitched crying, tremors, and sleep disturbances, according to the study authors from the Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel in Petah Tiqwa, and other Israeli scientists. NAS tends to go away on its own and be of short duration. While none of the infants with NAS who were studied suffered from severe or life-threatening withdrawal, this possibility must be considered when discussing therapeutic plans with pregnant women whose depression is "euthymic" (under control) due to treatment.

As if these considerations weren't complex enough, yet a third study relevant to depression in pregnancy and its treatment appears in today's New England Journal of Medicine. A group of researchers from Boston and San Diego analyzed, retrospectively, the effect on the newborn of having a mother who took an SSRI in the last twenty weeks of pregnancy. They found that there was a significantly increased risk of a condition called persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN) in neonates of mothers on SSRIs after the twentieth week. While the relative risk of PPHN was about six-fold higher than in mothers who took other antidepressants or none, the actual risk of PPHN rises from two in a thousand (among those not on any medications) to about ten in a thousand, or 1%. PPHN often has severe consequences, ranging from chronic diseases of the brain and nervous system, to death in about 7% of those affected. Other studies, however, have found a much lower risk of PPHN in those on an SSRI, with the largest study finding a rate of only three per thousand. Further, the new study was small, comprising only 377 women with infants who developed PPHN, and was not a controlled, randomized study. While such controlled studies need to be done, and should include not only SSRIs but also the newer SNRIs (serotonin and norepinephrine release inhibitors), the benefits and the risks -- to mother, fetus, and newborn -- of choosing to remain on or go off antidepressants should be discussed among individual women, their obstetricians, their psychiatrists, and a significant other when appropriate. (Also: see ACSH's report on drug benefits and risks.) 

Most studies have shown that maternal treatment with SSRIs and related drugs has no major effect on the newborn -- but both short-term minor effects (such as mild NAS) and the possibility of long-term effects, whether PPHN or those as yet undiscovered, should be thoroughly evaluated before a final treatment decision is made. Indeed, such "final" plans may need to be modified as circumstances demand it. Some things, however, are certain: depression during pregnancy is a major problem; it is not eased by the pregnant state; and relapse is likely if medications are stopped, with attendant adverse effects on both mother and baby possible. Although there is some risk to the newborn from commonly used antidepressants, mothers and obstetricians who might have reflexively stopped medications when pregnancy occurs should at least now think twice.


Gilbert Ross, M.D., is Executive and Medical Director of the American Council on Science and Health (ACSH.org, HealthFactsAndFears.com).

 

Visitor Responses

Brenda J. Squires (February 11, 2006)

Ladies, do read Kevin Trudeau's book. Yes, in the end he wants you to buy something. But he does tell you about cleanses and such. Yet, I am going by the way the man looks. If he is doing all the things he tells us to do, and I believe he is, is that why he looks the way he does? He does not have a pimple on his face, no bags under his eyes, he is not fat, he has a full head of dark gorgeous hair, his mind is quick. He's a doll! What more could you ask?


Drawing of Todd Seavey


About the Editor:
Todd Seavey

is Director of Publications at ACSH and edits FactsAndFears.  His opinions are not necessarily ACSH's.

He can be reached at seavey [at] acsh.org.

Subscribe to ACSH.org RSS  FactsAndFears posts on YOUR site
Search Archives Icon for Search
Search

Icon for Browse Archives Browse Archives

Sign In Icon for Sign In

Username:

Password:

Sign In Now >>

Forget your password?

Register

Why register with ACSH?
You'll be able to:
¥ Post comments to articles
¥ Subscribe to e-bulletin
¥ Receive immediate or scheduled updates


Register Now >>

¥ (from ACSH) theScooponSmoking.org
¥ aBetterEarth.org
¥ AgBioWorld
¥ American Justice Partnership
¥ Anti-Quackery and Science Blog
¥ Anti-Quackery Ring
¥ BiomonitoringInfo.org
¥ Blogborygmi.com (Nick Gene & co.)
¥ CalorieLab
¥ The Cancer Blog
¥ CAST on transgenic animals
¥ Catallarchy (econ, etc.)
¥ Competitive Enterprise Institute
¥ ConsumerFreedom.com
¥ Debunkers.org
¥ Diet-Blog.com
¥ Dynamist/Virginia Postrel
¥ Fishscam
¥ Freakonomics
¥ GruntDoc
¥ Health Beat (medical news/research)
¥ Health Business Blog
¥ Health Intelligence Network blog
¥ In the Pipeline (drugs per Derek Lowe)
¥ Infography on Medical Care: Quacks, Quackery
¥ Institute of Ideas
¥ JunkScience.com (Steve Milloy)
¥ MedMusings
¥ National Council Against Health Fraud
¥ Overlawyered.com
¥ ParkinsonsHealth
¥ Quackbusters
¥ Quackfiles
¥ Quackfiles.blogspot.com
¥ Quackwatch
¥ James Randi, ultimate skeptic
¥ Rangel, M.D.
¥ Reason (including Seavey pieces)
¥ SAGEcrossroads.net (aging)
¥ Scientific Review of Alternative Medicine
¥ Science Media Centre
¥ Sense About Science
¥ Skeptic Magazine
¥ Skeptic Ring
¥ Skeptical Inquirer/CSICOP
¥ Spiked-Online
¥ TCS Daily (Europe)
¥ TCS Daily (U.S.)
¥ 3 Billion and Counting (malaria docu. w/Ross)
¥ Tobacco Survivors United
¥ TobaccoAnalysis blog
¥ Urban Legends per Snopes
¥ US News Best Health Heart Center
¥ US News Lung Cancer Center
¥ Volokh.com (blog on law, econ, polisci)
¥ Washington Legal Foundation
¥ WhyBiotech (Council for Biotechnology Info.)
¥ WhyQuit.com (case studies, message boards, etc.)
¥ Dr. Carl Winter (health song-parodies)
¥ aWorldConnected.org (benefits of globalization)


TO VIEW AND MAKE COMMENTS ON THE ARTICLES ABOVE (OR OTHERS), "SIGN IN" AT THE RIGHT MARGIN.

AMERICAN COUNCIL ON SCIENCE AND HEALTH  |  1995 BROADWAY, 2ND FLOOR, NEW YORK, NY 10023-5860
TELEPHONE: (212) 362-7044  |  FAX: (212) 362-4919  |  E-MAIL: GEN. ORGANIZATION MAILBOX: acsh (at) acsh.org; IND. STAFFER: [last name or last name followed by first initial]@acsh.org 

Copyright © 1997-2004 American Council on Science and Health  |  Privacy Policy  |  All Rights Reserved
.

Founded in 1978, ACSH is a consumer advocacy organization directed and advised by over 350 physicians, scientists and policy advisors. ACSH promotes the use of sound, peer-reviewed science in the formation of a full  spectrum of  public health policies, including those related to food, pharmaceuticals, environmental chemicals, lifestyle factors, consumer products and terrorism preparedness and response.