American Council on Science and Health American Council on Science and Health
About
ACSH
¥ Contact
ACSH
¥ Support
ACSH
¥ My
ACSH
¥ Advanced
Search
 
ACSH.org   Home   . .   Health Issues   . .   News Center   . .   Publications   . .   Events   . .   FactsAndFears   .  

Health Facts And Fears

Archives >

Printer Format icon Printer Format
E-mail Information icon E-mail Information
December 19, 2006

Schizophrenic Coverage of Zyprexa

By Jeff Stier, Esq.

The media's coverage of the Zyprexa story is schizophrenic. When we released our peer-reviewed report, Weighing Benefits and Risks in Pharmaceutical Use: A Consumer's Guide, health reporters gave it a collective yawn. They said we stated the obvious -- that all drugs have risks, and patients and physicians together should balance those risks with the potential benefits according to each patient's unique profile to make an informed decision accordingly.

Conceptually, the reporters get it. Yet anytime allegations are made about a specific risk of a certain drug, reporters are all too quick to jump on the plaintiff's bar scandal bandwagon. When the issue is conceptual, reporters are calm and rational. When they sniff scandal, common sense goes out the window.

The story line is all too predictable. Since the allegations of risk alone are not enough to nail down huge punitive damages, they must also charge a cover-up. This is exactly what played out over the weekend when the  New York Times alleged that Eli Lilly engaged in a campaign to downplay the risks of their top-selling drug, Zyprexa, a key treatment for two devastating mental illnesses: schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.

Zyprexa is known to cause weight gain, and some have charged that it increases the risk of diabetes as well, but that charge has not been fully substantiated.

Surely, pharmaceutical companies must be fully forthright with the FDA, physicians, as well as patients, regarding the risks of any drug. If a drug company did not reveal all the potential downsides of their product, their actions would make it impossible for a patient and physician to make a proper and fully informed decision. However, a thorough discussion of the allegations made in the Times article is outside the scope of this analysis.

My concern from a public health perspective is that with the media now in an anti-Zyprexa feeding frenzy, patients, such as those diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia, may go off their medication without consulting with their physicians. And worse, there may be a tendency for some physicians to practice defensive medicine by abruptly discontinuing treatment -- not because such a reaction is in the best interest of the patient, but rather because it seems like the safest choice for the doctor and his or her insurance company. Yes, Zyprexa (like all drugs,) has its risks, but especially for patients with serious mental disorders, not assuming certain risks could expose them to increased risks associated with inadequate treatment.

When faced with the devastating consequences of schizophrenia, many patients, together with their care-takers, may be willing to accept the risk of weight gain, and perhaps even diabetes, if it is indeed a risk, for the huge benefit of keeping their disorder under control.

More broadly, another negative public health consequence of over-reacting to this story is that it portends a huge transfer of wealth from investors who put their capital at risk to make life saving drugs to unscrupulous lawyers. Such an outcome will inevitably lead to less investment in drug research, and as such, less innovation to develop the new drugs that benefit consumers.

Mentally ill patients and their physicians must already overcome stigma to begin the road to a more normal existence. Anti-pharmaceutical activists, the plaintiff's bar, and their allies in the media must take extra care to deal with this matter responsibly, so as not to unnecessarily further complicate a well-thought out treatment plan for patients who have found Zyprexa to be a path toward a more normal life.

Visitor Responses

Erica Schachne (January 3, 2007)

Coming from a psychiatric perspective, I agree with what you said. Many, many anti-depressant and anti-psychotic drugs cause weight gain and there is nothing earth shattering about this side effect. As you said, the benefit of better mental health and life functioning outweighs the discomfort of the side effect in many cases. In addition, while diabetes is an important health issue, many patients will be willing to accept the risk of this side effect as well. First of all, there is a risk for it - I don't think everyone is guaranteed to develop it. Did they post the probability? Also, it is the type of condition that can be kept under control with the proper daily/medical attention. Other accepted drugs also have potential medical side effects. For example, Wellbutrin, an anti-depressant that doesn't cause weight gain or sexual disfunction (it is not an SSRI) does carry the risk of possible epileptic seizures. But the drug is widely accepted.


Drawing of Todd Seavey


About the Editor:
Todd Seavey

is Director of Publications at ACSH and edits FactsAndFears.  His opinions are not necessarily ACSH's.

He can be reached at seavey [at] acsh.org.

Subscribe to ACSH.org RSS  FactsAndFears posts on YOUR site
Search Archives Icon for Search
Search

Icon for Browse Archives Browse Archives

Sign In Icon for Sign In

Username:

Password:

Sign In Now >>

Forget your password?

Register

Why register with ACSH?
You'll be able to:
¥ Post comments to articles
¥ Subscribe to e-bulletin
¥ Receive immediate or scheduled updates


Register Now >>

¥ (from ACSH) theScooponSmoking.org
¥ aBetterEarth.org
¥ AgBioWorld
¥ American Justice Partnership
¥ Anti-Quackery and Science Blog
¥ Anti-Quackery Ring
¥ BiomonitoringInfo.org
¥ Blogborygmi.com (Nick Gene & co.)
¥ CalorieLab
¥ The Cancer Blog
¥ CAST on transgenic animals
¥ Catallarchy (econ, etc.)
¥ Competitive Enterprise Institute
¥ Consumer Guide to Bariatric Surgery
¥ ConsumerFreedom.com
¥ Debunkers.org
¥ Diet-Blog.com
¥ Dynamist/Virginia Postrel
¥ Fishscam
¥ Freakonomics
¥ GruntDoc
¥ Health Beat (medical news/research)
¥ Health Business Blog
¥ Health Intelligence Network blog
¥ In the Pipeline (drugs per Derek Lowe)
¥ Infography on Medical Care: Quacks, Quackery
¥ Institute of Ideas
¥ JunkScience.com (Steve Milloy)
¥ MedMusings
¥ National Council Against Health Fraud
¥ New Doctor
¥ Overlawyered.com
¥ ParkinsonsHealth
¥ Quackbusters
¥ Quackfiles
¥ Quackfiles.blogspot.com
¥ Quackwatch
¥ James Randi, ultimate skeptic
¥ Rangel, M.D.
¥ Reason (including Seavey pieces)
¥ SAGEcrossroads.net (aging)
¥ Scientific Review of Alternative Medicine
¥ Science Media Centre
¥ Sense About Science
¥ Skeptic Magazine
¥ Skeptic Ring
¥ Skeptical Inquirer/CSICOP
¥ Spiked-Online
¥ TCS Daily (Europe)
¥ TCS Daily (U.S.)
¥ 3 Billion and Counting (malaria docu. w/Ross)
¥ Tobacco Survivors United
¥ TobaccoAnalysis blog
¥ Urban Legends per Snopes
¥ US News Best Health Heart Center
¥ US News Lung Cancer Center
¥ Volokh.com (blog on law, econ, polisci)
¥ Washington Legal Foundation
¥ WhyBiotech (Council for Biotechnology Info.)
¥ WhyQuit.com (case studies, message boards, etc.)
¥ Dr. Carl Winter (health song-parodies)
¥ aWorldConnected.org (benefits of globalization)


TO VIEW AND MAKE COMMENTS ON THE ARTICLES ABOVE (OR OTHERS), "SIGN IN" AT THE RIGHT MARGIN.

AMERICAN COUNCIL ON SCIENCE AND HEALTH  |  1995 BROADWAY, 2ND FLOOR, NEW YORK, NY 10023-5860
TELEPHONE: (212) 362-7044  |  FAX: (212) 362-4919  |  E-MAIL: GEN. ORGANIZATION MAILBOX: acsh (at) acsh.org; IND. STAFFER: [last name or last name followed by first initial]@acsh.org 

Copyright © 1997-2004 American Council on Science and Health  |  Privacy Policy  |  All Rights Reserved
.

Founded in 1978, ACSH is a consumer advocacy organization directed and advised by over 350 physicians, scientists and policy advisors. ACSH promotes the use of sound, peer-reviewed science in the formation of a full  spectrum of  public health policies, including those related to food, pharmaceuticals, environmental chemicals, lifestyle factors, consumer products and terrorism preparedness and response.