American Council on Science and Health American Council on Science and Health
About
ACSH
¥ Contact
ACSH
¥ Support
ACSH
¥ My
ACSH
¥ Advanced
Search
 
ACSH.org   Home   . .   Health Issues   . .   News Center   . .   Publications   . .   Events   . .   FactsAndFears   .  

Health Facts And Fears

Archives >

Printer Format icon Printer Format
E-mail Information icon E-mail Information
May 2, 2007

Irradiated Indian Mangoes!

By Ruth Kava, Ph.D., R.D.

Thanks to a much-maligned food safety technology -- irradiation -- Indian mangoes have at last made it to our shores. Among mango-lovers, it seems to be an article of faith that those grown in India are the best of the best -- the most mango-y mangoes ever. Unfortunately, until last week there wasn't much chance American mango aficionados would get to consume them without a visit to the land of the Taj Mahal.

The problem was that Indian mangoes have been barred from the U.S. because they can harbor an insect pest -- the mango seed weevil -- that is not currently found here. This pest is hard to get at -- its larvae burrow into the developing mango and take up residence in the seed. They complete their life cycle there, then find their way out through the flesh of the fruit, damaging it as they go. Because they live inside the fruit, pesticides or other treatments applied externally just don't reach these evil weevils.

In 2002, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) ruled that irradiation to kill the weevil would make Indian mangoes (as well as those from other tropical areas such as Hawaii and Central America) safe for import to the U.S. mainland, thus providing a huge new market for these fruits.

Irradiation not only kills these weevils, it also is effective against a wide variety of other pests such as fruit flies. There are several benefits of using irradiation as a sanitizing process. It reduces the need for insecticides and leaves no residues on or in the fruits. Further, irradiated mangoes and other fruits (e.g., strawberries) typically have their ripening process slowed somewhat, which means they have longer shelf lives and thus can likely withstand the rigors of shipping and storage without being damaged.

The only drawback to using irradiation for sanitizing fruits -- or indeed for any of a number of potential uses -- is that many people are afraid of it. But their fears are unfounded. Irradiation does not generate nuclear wastes -- as some activists would have us believe -- nor does it produce toxic compounds in foods. Such fear-mongering has slowed the adoption of irradiation for other approved foods -- ground beef and poultry, for example -- and left the population unnecessarily vulnerable to foodborne illnesses.

Irradiation facilities do not endanger either workers or the communities in which they're located. Irradiated Indian mangoes are just the first items from a cornucopia of tropical fruits that have not been available to American consumers because of concerns about pest importation. And one thing we do know is that Americans should be adding more fruits to their diets. Let's hope a greater variety of imported fruits will help achieve this goal in a most delicious way.


Ruth Kava, Ph.D., R.D., is Director of Nutrition at the American Council on Science and Health (ACSH.org, HealthFactsAndFears.com).

 

See also: ACSH's full report on Irradiated Foods.



Drawing of Todd Seavey


About the Editor:
Todd Seavey

is Director of Publications at ACSH and edits FactsAndFears.  His opinions are not necessarily ACSH's.

He can be reached at seavey [at] acsh.org.

Subscribe to ACSH.org RSS  FactsAndFears posts on YOUR site
Search Archives Icon for Search
Search

Icon for Browse Archives Browse Archives

Sign In Icon for Sign In

Username:

Password:

Sign In Now >>

Forget your password?

Register

Why register with ACSH?
You'll be able to:
¥ Post comments to articles
¥ Subscribe to e-bulletin
¥ Receive immediate or scheduled updates


Register Now >>

¥ (from ACSH) theScooponSmoking.org
¥ aBetterEarth.org
¥ AgBioWorld
¥ American Justice Partnership
¥ Anti-Quackery and Science Blog
¥ Anti-Quackery Ring
¥ BiomonitoringInfo.org
¥ Blogborygmi.com (Nick Gene & co.)
¥ CalorieLab
¥ The Cancer Blog
¥ CAST on transgenic animals
¥ Catallarchy (econ, etc.)
¥ Competitive Enterprise Institute
¥ Consumer Guide to Bariatric Surgery
¥ ConsumerFreedom.com
¥ Debunkers.org
¥ Diet-Blog.com
¥ Dynamist/Virginia Postrel
¥ Fishscam
¥ Freakonomics
¥ GruntDoc
¥ Health Beat (medical news/research)
¥ Health Business Blog
¥ Health Intelligence Network blog
¥ In the Pipeline (drugs per Derek Lowe)
¥ Infography on Medical Care: Quacks, Quackery
¥ Institute of Ideas
¥ JunkScience.com (Steve Milloy)
¥ MedMusings
¥ National Council Against Health Fraud
¥ New Doctor
¥ Overlawyered.com
¥ ParkinsonsHealth
¥ Quackbusters
¥ Quackfiles
¥ Quackfiles.blogspot.com
¥ Quackwatch
¥ James Randi, ultimate skeptic
¥ Rangel, M.D.
¥ Reason (including Seavey pieces)
¥ SAGEcrossroads.net (aging)
¥ Scientific Review of Alternative Medicine
¥ Science Media Centre
¥ Sense About Science
¥ Skeptic Magazine
¥ Skeptic Ring
¥ Skeptical Inquirer/CSICOP
¥ Spiked-Online
¥ TCS Daily (Europe)
¥ TCS Daily (U.S.)
¥ 3 Billion and Counting (malaria docu. w/Ross)
¥ Tobacco Survivors United
¥ TobaccoAnalysis blog
¥ Urban Legends per Snopes
¥ US News Best Health Heart Center
¥ US News Lung Cancer Center
¥ Volokh.com (blog on law, econ, polisci)
¥ Washington Legal Foundation
¥ WhyBiotech (Council for Biotechnology Info.)
¥ WhyQuit.com (case studies, message boards, etc.)
¥ Dr. Carl Winter (health song-parodies)
¥ aWorldConnected.org (benefits of globalization)


TO VIEW AND MAKE COMMENTS ON THE ARTICLES ABOVE (OR OTHERS), "SIGN IN" AT THE RIGHT MARGIN.

AMERICAN COUNCIL ON SCIENCE AND HEALTH  |  1995 BROADWAY, 2ND FLOOR, NEW YORK, NY 10023-5860
TELEPHONE: (212) 362-7044  |  FAX: (212) 362-4919  |  E-MAIL: GEN. ORGANIZATION MAILBOX: acsh (at) acsh.org; IND. STAFFER: [last name or last name followed by first initial]@acsh.org 

Copyright © 1997-2004 American Council on Science and Health  |  Privacy Policy  |  All Rights Reserved
.

Founded in 1978, ACSH is a consumer advocacy organization directed and advised by over 350 physicians, scientists and policy advisors. ACSH promotes the use of sound, peer-reviewed science in the formation of a full  spectrum of  public health policies, including those related to food, pharmaceuticals, environmental chemicals, lifestyle factors, consumer products and terrorism preparedness and response.