American Council on Science and Health American Council on Science and Health
About
ACSH
¥ Contact
ACSH
¥ Support
ACSH
¥ My
ACSH
¥ Advanced
Search
 
ACSH.org   Home   . .   Health Issues   . .   News Center   . .   Publications   . .   Events   . .   FactsAndFears   .  

Health Facts And Fears

Archives >

Printer Format icon Printer Format
E-mail Information icon E-mail Information
July 6, 2007

Deciphering Sunscreen Labels

By Patricia Ludwig

“Immediate Protection!” “Ultra waterproof/sweatproof!” “Continuous Protection!” “Extra UVA Protection!” “All day protection!”—Sunscreen tubes prominently display these sweeping claims. But how reliable are they and which should be considered when buying a sunscreen?

All sunscreens are designed to reduce the exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation from the sun. As Dr. James Spencer, a dermatologist from St. Petersburg, Florida, told the New York Times,  sunscreen must be applied every few hours and should be reapplied immediately after coming out of the water, and after profuse sweating. Therefore, the “All day protection” claim is probably misleading and the “waterproof” claim gives users an exaggerated sense of protection.

In the next few weeks, the FDA is expected to update sunscreen labeling standards to help give consumers a clearer sense of how much protection their product actually provides. UVA and UVB rays are the two components of sunlight that cause damage. UVA rays are less responsible for burning, but penetrate the skin more deeply thus posing some risk of cancer and aging-related changes. UVB rays cause burning and can also increase the risk of some types of cancer. 

The current system, proposed in 1978, has no standardized UVA rating system, and thus consumers have no way of knowing how much protection they are getting from these potentially dangerous UV rays. A second problem is that the current SPF (Sun Protection Factor) system, which indicates multiples of how much longer a person can stay in the sun without burning than they could without sunscreen, is confusing. Consumers generally have to resort to a trial and error system in order to decipher sunscreen labels. The new FDA regulations are intended to provide much needed clarification. Until then, the best bet is to buy a sunscreen with “broad spectrum” protection against both UVA and UVB rays and to apply it thirty minutes before going outdoors and reapply every few hours or immediately after coming out of the water. And use enough to ensure adequate coverage: a teaspoonful for the face and a fourth of a cup for the body, are needed for real protection.

But remember that the best way to avoid sun damage is still to stay out of the sun and keep your skin covered. Sunscreen alone does not allow one to lie out in the sun all day, free of the risks from harmful rays.

Pleases see ACSH’s publication “Health and Safety Tips for Your Summer Vacation (2007)”  for further information on sun protection.


Drawing of Todd Seavey


About the Editor:
Todd Seavey

is Director of Publications at ACSH and edits FactsAndFears.  His opinions are not necessarily ACSH's.

He can be reached at seavey [at] acsh.org.

Subscribe to ACSH.org RSS  FactsAndFears posts on YOUR site
Search Archives Icon for Search
Search

Icon for Browse Archives Browse Archives

Sign In Icon for Sign In

Username:

Password:

Sign In Now >>

Forget your password?

Register

Why register with ACSH?
You'll be able to:
¥ Post comments to articles
¥ Subscribe to e-bulletin
¥ Receive immediate or scheduled updates


Register Now >>

¥ (from ACSH) theScooponSmoking.org
¥ aBetterEarth.org
¥ AgBioWorld
¥ American Justice Partnership
¥ Anti-Quackery and Science Blog
¥ Anti-Quackery Ring
¥ BiomonitoringInfo.org
¥ Blogborygmi.com (Nick Gene & co.)
¥ CalorieLab
¥ The Cancer Blog
¥ CAST on transgenic animals
¥ Catallarchy (econ, etc.)
¥ Competitive Enterprise Institute
¥ ConsumerFreedom.com
¥ Debunkers.org
¥ Diet-Blog.com
¥ Dynamist/Virginia Postrel
¥ Fishscam
¥ Freakonomics
¥ GruntDoc
¥ Health Beat (medical news/research)
¥ Health Business Blog
¥ Health Intelligence Network blog
¥ In the Pipeline (drugs per Derek Lowe)
¥ Infography on Medical Care: Quacks, Quackery
¥ Institute of Ideas
¥ JunkScience.com (Steve Milloy)
¥ MedMusings
¥ National Council Against Health Fraud
¥ Overlawyered.com
¥ ParkinsonsHealth
¥ Quackbusters
¥ Quackfiles
¥ Quackfiles.blogspot.com
¥ Quackwatch
¥ James Randi, ultimate skeptic
¥ Rangel, M.D.
¥ Reason (including Seavey pieces)
¥ SAGEcrossroads.net (aging)
¥ Scientific Review of Alternative Medicine
¥ Science Media Centre
¥ Sense About Science
¥ Skeptic Magazine
¥ Skeptic Ring
¥ Skeptical Inquirer/CSICOP
¥ Spiked-Online
¥ TCS Daily (Europe)
¥ TCS Daily (U.S.)
¥ 3 Billion and Counting (malaria docu. w/Ross)
¥ Tobacco Survivors United
¥ TobaccoAnalysis blog
¥ Urban Legends per Snopes
¥ US News Best Health Heart Center
¥ US News Lung Cancer Center
¥ Volokh.com (blog on law, econ, polisci)
¥ Washington Legal Foundation
¥ WhyBiotech (Council for Biotechnology Info.)
¥ WhyQuit.com (case studies, message boards, etc.)
¥ Dr. Carl Winter (health song-parodies)
¥ aWorldConnected.org (benefits of globalization)


TO VIEW AND MAKE COMMENTS ON THE ARTICLES ABOVE (OR OTHERS), "SIGN IN" AT THE RIGHT MARGIN.

AMERICAN COUNCIL ON SCIENCE AND HEALTH  |  1995 BROADWAY, 2ND FLOOR, NEW YORK, NY 10023-5860
TELEPHONE: (212) 362-7044  |  FAX: (212) 362-4919  |  E-MAIL: GEN. ORGANIZATION MAILBOX: acsh (at) acsh.org; IND. STAFFER: [last name or last name followed by first initial]@acsh.org 

Copyright © 1997-2004 American Council on Science and Health  |  Privacy Policy  |  All Rights Reserved
.

Founded in 1978, ACSH is a consumer advocacy organization directed and advised by over 350 physicians, scientists and policy advisors. ACSH promotes the use of sound, peer-reviewed science in the formation of a full  spectrum of  public health policies, including those related to food, pharmaceuticals, environmental chemicals, lifestyle factors, consumer products and terrorism preparedness and response.