American Council on Science and Health American Council on Science and Health
About
ACSH
₯ Contact
ACSH
₯ Support
ACSH
₯ My
ACSH
₯ Advanced
Search
 
ACSH.org   Home   . .   Health Issues   . .   News Center   . .   Publications   . .   Events   . .   FactsAndFears   .  
Health Issues
Browse by:
- Author
- Title
- Date

Subscribe to ACSH.org RSS  ACSH articles for YOUR site

Food Industry To Blame for Fat?    
Printer Format icon Printer Format
Email Information icon E-mail Information

By Elizabeth M. Whelan, Sc.D., M.P.H.
Posted: Tuesday, March 12, 2002

ARTICLES
Publication Date: March 12, 2002

Marion Nestle, New York University Professor of Nutrition and Food Studies, is furious at the food industry for making Americans fat and sick. And she has written a book, Food Politics: How the Food Industry Influences Nutrition and Health, documenting her charges.

Dr. Nestle (who, among other accomplishments, was managing editor of the l988 Surgeon General's Report on Nutrition and Health) is appalled that food corporations are focused on their economic bottom line and care more about profits and making their shareholders happy than they do about keeping consumers healthy.

She is apoplectic about the facts that a) food companies advertise and promote their foods, particularly good tasting foods which do not meet all the criteria for nutritional correctness and b) they even turn to modern-day food technology to allow us to consume desserts and snacks, which she considers to be junk, at reduced caloric levels (she strenuously objects to fat substitutes like Olestra).

Indeed, if we were to take Marion Nestle's arguments at their face value, we would be advocating that food companies be run not by businesspeople but by academic physicians and scientists who were committed to creating a nutrition utopia — whether consumers wanted those foods or not and regardless of whether corporations succeeded economically.

We must at least agree with one of Dr. Nestle's basic premises: Americans, both adults and children, are more overweight than ever and being overweight carries with it some very serious — indeed life-threatening — adverse health effects. It has been said that we Americans now suffer from malnutrition of affluence. We have more economic resources to purchase food, so we eat more. But of course, that is only half of the nutrition equation. We also utilize fewer calories through exercise, and the result is excess weight. With these extra pounds we face increased risk of myriad ailments, including diabetes, heart disease, even breast cancer (obesity in middle-aged women is an established risk factor for breast cancer).

But who is to blame for the fattening of America? Dr. Nestle points the finger of blame directly at the "food industry," which she regards as a monolithic, profit-hungry, health-be-damned economic force over which we, as individuals, have no control. But we are hardly helpless victims here, captives of the psychological power the "food industry" holds over us through advertising, lobbying, and promotion. Indeed the "food industry" is anything but monolithic, with a dizzying array of competitive products out there for us to buy. We make choices, and sometimes those choices in the long run are unhealthy. If we are eating more calories daily than we need to maintain an ideal weight and if we do not make time in our schedule for regular exercise, we are to blame, not the corporation who may spend millions advertising Cheese Doodles.

Indeed, a stronger case could be made that current economic pressures — and the need for multiple bread-winners in the family — are responsible for our failure to eat prudently and make time for swimming, jogging, or other calorie-burning activity. With fewer hours available for meal preparation and family time, processed foods, often more calorically-dense than a home-cooked meal, are appealing. How is this the fault of the food industry, which is, after all, giving the consumer what he/she wants?

Dr. Nestle is correct in arguing that our health would improve if we replaced some of the empty calories in our diet with more fruits and vegetables. And yes, sugar-and-fat laden snacks in vending machines in elementary schools, where access is unsupervised, could well jeopardize a pattern of balanced nutrition for young children.

But making so-called "junk food" (which might better be characterized as "fun food") available for teenagers and adults is simply a matter of choice — and when used in moderation as part of a balanced diet, such "junk food" as soda, candy, popcorn, and snacks pose no health problem at all. (Perhaps the most infuriating references in Dr. Nestle's book are those equating the advertising and promotion of food with those of cigarettes, as if one could ever legitimately compare anything about a spectrum of foodstuffs — essential for long life and good health — with a physiologically addictive, inherently life-threatening product.)

Marion Nestle calls upon the government to take a more "serious approach to obesity prevention." If the end results of her quest were simply to have the government provide basic information on healthful diets and tips on avoiding health-threatening extra pounds, perhaps we would all benefit.

But the broader thrust of Food Politics is more disquieting than mere government-sponsored education. Beware the day that Dr. Nestle and her colleagues succeed in restricting advertising for their long list of forbidden foods, or perhaps, as some nutrition activists have already proposed, slapping "sin taxes" on foods that do not fit perfectly in the national nutritionists' permissible menu slots. Our prospects for long life, good heath, and the pursuit of happiness are far brighter in the hands of competitive, profit-driven food corporations than they are in those of national nutrition-nanny know-it-alls.


Editor's note: Dr. Whelan's book review was written for the Washington Times.

line
line
Responses:

March 14, 2002

Although I have not read the book, I have now read two reviews. As a registered dietitian, my thoughts are these: Yes, every American has the responsibility to control her own eating and exercise. However, as a nation, we are grossly overweight and overfed and under-exercised. We do eat junk. Our extra calories are not from healthy oils and nuts. Our extra calories are from fries, burgers, gooey cheesed everything — a lot of crap! Nestle is right on the mark about food producers. If we don't consume it, they lose. They want us to eat and eat and eat. And we do. To be so hard on her shows you have your head firmly under the sand.

Barbara Gollman, M.S., R.D
Food and Nutrition Consultant, Phytopia, Inc.
Author of The Phytopia Cookbook


March 20, 2002

Another good book on this subject is Fast Food Nation by Eric Schlosser. I am a "nutritionist-nanny" who works in public health, seeing the effects of the food industry every day. Nestle's book may be harsh; I have not read it myself. But I do think that the public needs to be more aware of the costs involved with obesity. The food industry has made it very difficult to recommend eating fruits and vegetables because it is cheaper to eat in an unhealthy way than in a healthy, balanced way. Maybe the stats are not there to compare the food industry with the tobacco industry, but the situation is real — at least 75% of children (under five years of age) that I see are already overweight for their height. We will pay in health costs for this epidemic!

—Denise Lozier, RD


March 25, 2002

I have read Marion Nestle's book Food Politics and I think it is one of the most important works I have seen. It should be required reading for all dietitians and researchers and absolutely mandatory for those who sit on government committees and set guidelines.

The problems of undue influence from the food industry that Nestle documents apply not only in the U.S., but also in other countries, including Australia. Here in Australia, the food industry influences what is sold in schools and what university researchers may or may not say. As in the U.S., our food industry also devotes resources to developing a range of highly profitable but useless techno-foods and tries desperately to find products that are as good as fruits and vegetables — a somewhat silly exercise when we already have fruits and vegetables. But unless any food has (p)added value, the food industry is not interested. Sadly, their value (p)adding is a factor in increasing obesity.

Countries spend millions of dollars looking for the reasons for obesity while ignoring the influence of the food industry. Why? Because the food industry's spin doctors and lobbyists have been so successful. We need people like Marion Nestle to expose the facts.

Sticking our heads in the sand and blaming the victim for making poor food choices is not helpful to anyone except the food industry, which is let off the hook. Taking some strong, principled stands against food industry power and backing this stand with evidence, as Professor Nestle has done, is much needed. We should thank her for her enlightening work.

—Dr. Rosemary Stanton, Ph.D.
Dietitian/nutritionist
Australia


August 23, 2002

Marion Nestle's book Food Politics: How the Food Industry Influences Nutrition and Health helps bring to the table (pun intended) a debate that needs to be perpetuated.

The status quo posture of the "food" products industry is contributing to the poor health of this nation, though it is not the only culprit. We do have personal choice, but it is often uninformed choice, with many companies' not wanting consumers to know what they're buying. Rather than comparing Big Food with Big Tobacco, maybe comparing it with Big Drugs is more accurate. Giant, colorful marketing campaigns are aimed at the consumer at every turn, suggesting that our lives will be wonderful on this drug or that, with side effects downplayed, if not totally undisclosed.

The playing field is uneven for foods in general. There is minimal money or incentive to market the virtues of fruits and vegetables, considered necessary and health-promoting foods, yet there is a gold mine for promoting soda pop, a totally unnecessary and potentially harmful category of food product. So kids in particular are drowning in a sea of junk food while their wholesome food "life rafts" are left uninflated.

We should applaud the courage of Marion Nestle for openly taking issue with the food industry. After all, while we claim to value health, as a nation we seem to do our damnedest to undermine it in favor of the quick buck. Only by discussing these problems will we begin to find solutions.

"Nature never deceives us; it is always we who deceive ourselves." —Jean-Jacques Rousseau

Terry A. Pollock, M.S.
Nutrition Consultant
Atlanta, GA

 

Quick Search


Search Advanced Search

 
 
 
 
my_acsh
Sign up for personalized e-mail alerts on your topics!  Read Full >>

About ACSH ¥ Contact ACSH ¥ Support ACSH ¥ My ACSH ¥ Advanced Search

AMERICAN COUNCIL ON SCIENCE AND HEALTH
1995 BROADWAY, 2ND FLOOR, NEW YORK, NY 10023-5860
TELEPHONE: (212) 362-7044 ¥ TOLL FREE: (866) 905-2694 ¥ FAX: (212) 362-4919 ¥ E-MAIL: General organization mailbox: acsh@acsh.org ; Individual staffer: [last name or last name followed by first initial]@acsh.org

Copyright © 1997-2003 American Council on Science and Health ¥ PRIVACY POLICY ¥ All Rights Reserved

Site Meter
Powered by eResources