American Council on Science and Health American Council on Science and Health
About
ACSH
¥ Contact
ACSH
¥ Support
ACSH
¥ My
ACSH
¥ Advanced
Search
 
ACSH.org   Home   . .   Health Issues   . .   News Center   . .   Publications   . .   Events   . .   FactsAndFears   .  
Celebrities Vs. Science
Publications
Issues
Browse by:
- Author
- Title
- Date
woc_conference

The Promise of Vaccines: The Science and the Controversy
By David R. Smith, M.D.
Posted: Monday, September 1, 2003
Printer Format icon Printer Format
Email Information icon E-mail Information

Executive Summary

Standing among the greatest achievements in public health, vaccines have had a greater impact on reducing death and disability from infectious diseases than almost any other public health intervention. This paper presents a comprehensive overview of vaccines and the science of immunity, including a discussion of the remarkable advances in disease prevention through the evolution of vaccines. We focus on several recent vaccine safety controversies that may prevent maximization of their potential.

Much attention has been devoted to vaccine safety and the potential relationship between various diseases and vaccinations, including influenza vaccine and Guillain-Barré syndrome, MMR (mumps, measles, and rubella) vaccine and autism and idiopathic thrombocytopenia purpura, thimerosal in vaccines and autism, hepatitis B vaccine and multiple sclerosis, and childhood vaccines and type 1 diabetes. The vast majority of reports linking vaccines with various diseases comprise case reports that do not meet the scientific criteria established to attribute causality. A review of recent studies published in the medical literature is presented to help clarify the scientific data related to the association between vaccines and these medical diagnoses. Also addressed are concerns about safety related to vaccine additives and preservatives, specifically thimerosal.

A serious public health problem exists as "community" or "herd" immunity declines with the erosion of immunization coverage in at-risk individuals and for whole communities. This trend has been exacerbated by recent more permissive changes in state laws enabling parents to opt out of immunizing their children for personal or philosophical reasons, placing those children and their classmates at risk. The measles epidemic of 1989 to 1991 clearly demonstrates the public health risk when coverage levels fall. Conversely, the potential for success in disease prevention is illustrated by the rapid decline in the incidence of invasive Haemophilus influenza type b after the introduction of the conjugate Hib vaccine, which has become one of the most compelling success stories in modern immunization practice.

In order to guarantee vaccine safety, maintain public confidence, and ensure the continued development of vaccines, a system of checks and balances is essential. The safety systems that involve collaborative efforts between the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the Department of Health and Human Services, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the creation of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment Project (CISA), and the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) are described.

Although our nation's commitment to improving coverage levels and eliminating vaccine-preventable diseases faces many challenges, vaccine science holds the possibility of targeting an increasing number of diseases for prevention, with the number of vaccines in widespread use projected to grow to over three times the current number by 2020.1 This story of our nation's progress towards eradicating vaccine-preventable diseases holds many lessons for the future and attempts to address several key questions: How well are we preventing diseases through vaccination? How safe are vaccinations? Is the public at risk because of erosion of coverage and because of philosophical exemptions? What challenges does the nation face as we attempt to improve vaccine coverage and eliminate vaccine-preventable diseases? With our attention diverted to low coverage levels in some inner cities, will the public health infrastructure be in a position to respond to a bioterrorism event in which agents such as smallpox could be reintroduced as a weapon?

Related Links
Vaccinations: What Parents Need to Know
What's the Story? Childhood Immunizations
 

Quick Search


Search Advanced Search

 
 
 
 
woc_conference
Published: September 2003
Available for Purchase
Paperback
ISBN: xxxx
Dimensions: 6 x 9
Price: $5.00
View PDF Version  

About ACSH ¥ Contact ACSH ¥ Support ACSH ¥ My ACSH ¥ Advanced Search

AMERICAN COUNCIL ON SCIENCE AND HEALTH
1995 BROADWAY, 2ND FLOOR, NEW YORK, NY 10023-5860
TELEPHONE: (212) 362-7044 ¥ TOLL FREE: (866) 905-2694 ¥ FAX: (212) 362-4919 ¥ E-MAIL: General organization mailbox: acsh@acsh.org ; Individual staffer: [last name or last name followed by first initial]@acsh.org

Copyright © 1997-2003 American Council on Science and Health ¥ PRIVACY POLICY ¥ All Rights Reserved

Powered by eResources