Daubert is the legal standard federal courts and 44 States, use to decide whether expert scientific testimony is sound enough for a jury to consider.
judicial gatekeeping
While the evidence and experts in the two cases differ, the basis for the decisions and the judges’ approach in making their rulings are identical: Both found that the plaintiffs’ experts’ testimony was scientifically unreliable under
“By September, we will know what has caused the autism epidemic, and we'll be able to eliminate those exposures." - Rober
