The plague is back but it's not black. It's worse.

By Josh Bloom and David Shlaes —
Something strange and potentially frightening is going on at a Russian laboratory in Siberia. One or more scientists have reportedly died, others are under quarantine, and pneumonic plague is being investigated as a possible explanation. It sounds disturbingly like something out of Connie Willis's Doomsday Book, except this time it's not fiction.
Image by ACSH using AI

If you read Doomsday Book by Connie Willis (1992), you may have lost a few nights' sleep. It's a terrifying story about an Oxford historian from the future who travels back to medieval England, only to arrive in 1348 (instead of 1320 as planned), just as the Black Death begins to ravage the country.

Armed with modern knowledge but none of modern medicine, she can do little more than watch as the people around her, some of whom she has become attached to, become sick and die. It was a difficult read, but a brilliant book that won the 1992 Nebula and 1993 Hugo Awards for Best Novel, two of science fiction’s highest honors.

As if the book wasn't scary enough, what we think of as "the plague" can take several forms. Bubonic plague is the one everybody knows, complete with its grotesquely swollen lymph nodes, or buboes. But pneumonic plague is even worse. Once Yersinia pestis infects the lungs, the disease can progress with terrifying speed, causing severe pneumonia, respiratory failure, and sometimes bloody sputum. Untreated, death can follow within days.

Fortunately, Y. pestis can usually be successfully treated with antibiotics, provided treatment begins quickly. Unfortunately for the characters in Doomsday Book, they would have to wait another six centuries for those drugs to arrive.

Yet here we are nearly seven centuries later, and reports that one or more Russian scientists may have died from plague, possibly the pneumonic form, have once again put this ancient killer in the news. Whatever is going on over there is hardly comforting, but we'll leave the speculation to others. Instead, let's look at the science.

Laboratory exposure to plague is not unprecedented. Of more than 1,000 plague cases reported in the United States, 27 resulted from occupational exposure, including five infections in laboratory researchers. The most recent U.S. laboratory-acquired infection occurred in 2009 and was fatal. Plague vaccines are available outside the United States, although none is currently licensed here. Where they are available, vaccination is generally recommended only for people at high risk of exposure, including researchers who work with Y. pestis.

Meet Yersinia pestis

Yersinia pestis is an extraordinarily virulent bacterium whose natural ecology involves rodents and the fleas that feed on them. Infected fleas can transmit the bacterium to other rodents, other mammals, and humans. Some wild rodents can harbor Y. pestis without obvious illness, allowing the organism to persist in natural reservoirs.

Cats are particularly susceptible to plague and can become infected through contact with infected rodents. They can, in turn, transmit the infection to humans. Under certain circumstances, plague can also spread directly from person to person. That becomes especially important with pneumonic plague because respiratory droplets from an infected person can transmit the bacterium without requiring a flea at all.

Plague then and now

This is where 2026 differs rather dramatically from 1348. Plague is treatable with antibiotics, but speed matters. Because delaying treatment can be fatal, physicians are advised to begin antibiotics when plague is strongly suspected rather than waiting for laboratory confirmation.

Several antibiotics are effective against Y. pestis. Ciprofloxacin and other fluoroquinolones are important options, and depending on the patient's condition, they can be given orally or intravenously. Gentamicin is also widely used. Streptomycin, the classic plague antibiotic, remains effective but can be difficult to obtain. Treatment generally continues for about 10–14 days, depending on the drug and clinical circumstances.

Antibiotics have obviously changed the equation. Before their introduction, plague was extraordinarily lethal. In an analysis of U.S. plague cases from 1900 through 2012, 66 percent of patients died before antibiotics became available. After their introduction, mortality fell to 16 percent. More strikingly, among 377 patients with all forms of plague who received at least one dose of an effective antibiotic, 9 percent died, compared with 52 percent of those who received either no treatment or ineffective treatment.

Treatable doesn't mean harmless

A systematic review of 2,631 treated plague cases found an overall mortality rate of 13.6 percent. But among patients with pneumonic plague, 31.1 percent died despite receiving antimicrobial treatment. The corresponding figures were 14.2 percent for bubonic plague and 20 percent for septicemic plague.

A separate WHO evidence review reached a similar conclusion. Among the treated cases it examined, overall mortality was 21 percent. But it rose to 29 percent for pneumonic plague and 45 percent for septicemic plague, compared with 17 percent for bubonic plague.

Those numbers require an important qualification. They include patients treated during different eras, with different antibiotics, and at different stages of disease. They do not mean that someone who develops pneumonic plague today and receives prompt, appropriate treatment has a 30 percent chance of dying. In fact, WHO emphasizes that recovery rates for pneumonic plague are high when it is detected and treated promptly, ideally within 24 hours of symptom onset.

Still, those mortality figures make one thing abundantly clear. Having an antibiotic that kills a bacterium isn't the same thing as having unlimited time to use it. With pneumonic plague, the clock starts ticking very quickly.

Seven centuries after the Black Death, we have antibiotics that Connie Willis's doomed villagers could scarcely have imagined. Yersinia pestis is still perfectly capable of killing us.

And scaring the hell out of us.

Category
Subscribe to our newsletter

Josh Bloom

Director of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Science

Dr. Josh Bloom, the Director of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Science, comes from the world of drug discovery, where he did research for more than 20 years. He holds a Ph.D. in chemistry.

Recent articles by this author: