Daubert standard

While the evidence and experts in the two cases differ, the basis for the decisions and the judges’ approach in making their rulings are identical: Both found that the plaintiffs’ experts’ testimony was scientifically unreliable under

“By September, we will know what has caused the autism epidemic, and we'll be able to eliminate those exposures."    - Rober

The American public's trust in the U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) has significantly waned in recent years.

The 1993 Daubert decision assigns to judges the role of “gatekeepers” – meaning judges must first vet scientific evidence before its submission to the jury, and reject evidence that is not reliable, relevan

Some websites declare everyone has used or been exposed to glyphosate at some point, providing a treasure trove of potentia