Rep. Ocasio-Cortez, who fancies herself a visionary, challenged her critics to come up with an alternative to the Green New Deal. It wasn't very hard to do. Not only that, when the Fox Business Channel read Dr. Alex Berezow's plan, they invited him to discuss it on television last night. So he did. And here's his proposal.
I'd like to propose a plan to put Americans on Jupiter by 2030. It goes like this:
Rocket fuel is too heavy and polluting, so we will build special spacecraft that harness the energy of the stars, fusion power. Because Jupiter is really far away -- as in 600 days away -- we will travel at light speed. That cuts the trip to something like 33 minutes. (Perfect! That's just enough time to watch an episode of The Big Bang Theory.) Once we land on the planet, we will proudly plant a gigantic flag of the United Nations on its soil to celebrate this triumph of humanity.
Naysayers and other people who hate science inevitably will point out some flaws in this plan. Fusion power isn't yet feasible, they'll say. They'll whine about how the laws of physics don't permit travel at light speed. And they'll complain that Jupiter doesn't have a surface to land on.
Whatever. These losers just don't have any vision.
A Realistic Alternative to Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's Green New Deal
Does all that sound ridiculously arrogant and scientifically illiterate? Of course it does. Yet, that's basically how new Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC) has responded to the critics of her Green New Deal. We're all idiots. She's a visionary.
AOC's remark to "come up with your own ambitious, on-scale proposal" is precisely the sort of uneducated statement a person who knows literally nothing about a topic says. It's reminiscent of the anti-vaxxers who say, "If vaccines are so safe, show me the evidence!" There are entire research papers and books dedicated to energy policy. AOC just hasn't bothered to read any of them.
As it turns out, the solution to climate change isn't all that complicated. It won't be accomplished in 12 years; we couldn't even rebuild the World Trade Center in 12 years. But it can be done. I wrote a brief, 550-word article that gives a general outline. If even that's too long, here's the TL;DR version:
- Start building Generation IV nuclear power plants right now. Not next year. Not tomorrow. Right now. They are meltdown-proof and the best source of carbon-free energy on the planet. Research suggests that the entire world could be on nuclear power within 25 years.
- In the meantime, phase out coal while embracing natural gas. Natural gas burns cleaner than coal. If you object to this, then do #1 faster.
- Upgrade our energy infrastructure with a smart grid, smart meters, better capacitors, and better transmission lines. All of this is necessary if we want to rely at least in part on solar and wind. (But solar and wind aren't really necessary; see #1.)
- Invest in solar and fusion power research. Current solar technology is too inefficient. The breakthrough we've been seeking in solar hasn't happened yet, but it could. Similarly, fusion is theoretically the best source of energy (even better than nuclear), but scientists haven't figured this one out yet. It turns out that recreating the sun on earth is kind of hard.
- As our energy infrastructure improves, electric car technology will improve along with it, making fossil fuels largely obsolete. (Airplanes might always need fossil fuels, though, much to AOC's chagrin.)
That's it. It's not a sexy plan, but it's a realistic one. We could actually accomplish this, but so far, there has been no political will whatsoever to do it. Oddly, the biggest opponents are environmentalists, people like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.