Other Science News

Although the election is now “over,” its downstream fallout will continue for some time. Those of us engaged in communicating science will have to live with the impact of those who did and did not endorse.
Where to start here? The possibilities are endless. There is some real (and strange) medicine in this article as well as a treasure trove of chances to allow me to express my dominant juvenile humor allele. Let's start there.
Given the title, I was initially opposed to the thesis, but I must admit the author won me over.
“Without Aristotle’s Physics, there would have been no Galileo.” - Martin Heidegger
Every day, we make choices, often tradeoffs involving numbers, scores, or ratings. Countless websites ask us to quantify our experiences by using likes and stars.
If you're not perpetually online in the health space, you may have missed a scuff-up between several science communicators and followers of Vani Hari, aka The Food Babe.
My colleague Barbara Pfeffer Billauer and I wrote in August about recent Supreme Court decisions that produced sweeping chang
I suppose I should start by noting that I don’t frequent YouTube, Snapchat, TikTok, or any other social media or video sites, although I do watch occasional funny videos sent to me by friends, family, and coworkers.
This week, I begin with a bit of shameless self-promotion. This week’s Atlantic has a great article by Rose Horowitch on how free tuition impacts medical school graduates.
ACSH relies on donors like you. If you enjoy our work, please contribute.

Make your tax-deductible gift today!

 

 

Popular articles