There are wonders of the visual world—this week, dive into the hidden beauty of the plants that keep us alive, the less beautiful reality of why doctors over-test, and the existential crisis gripping young physicians who now see medicine as just another job. And if that wasn’t enough, we also have HIMs peddling pharmaceuticals. Some things are worth a closer look—others, not so much.
Search results
Science fiction has a way of masquerading as science fact — until someone like me comes with a bucket of cold, hard evidence. But let’s be real: debunking nonsense takes exponentially more effort than producing it. Jonathan Swift knew it in 1710, and here I am, centuries later, still speaking my truth before the next viral misinformation dumpster fire.
When COVID-19 vaccines rolled out, public health officials largely followed a simple logic: protect the most vulnerable first. The Great Barrington Declaration advocated for "focused protection" of the elderly and at-risk. But what if neither approach was the best way to save lives? A new study suggests that focusing on prevention — cutting off transmission routes — could sometimes be the smarter move. Did we get the vaccine strategy all wrong? Let’s dive in.
While our ancestors wagered on chariot races and bloodsport outcomes, today's high-tech hustlers are busy cashing in on online odds. As billions are wagered on sporting events and online platforms dominate the industry, an emerging public health challenge – one that includes depression, bipolar disorders, and suicidal behavior – demands our attention.
Recent senatorial hearings reflect the move to convict UPFs (ultra-processed food) as the culprit responsible for society’s obesity and juvenile metabolic diseases “epidemics” while deflecting focus from infectious disease prevention. But, in pursuing UPFs, are we ignoring other contributory or confounding factors like nicotine withdrawal, a couch potato culture and social media sloth, sugar substitutes, and environmental toxins? Before we torch the Twinkies, perhaps we should be sure we’re not pursuing the wrong perpetrator.
Allergic reactions to vitamin B12 are rare, but real. The reason may sound strange, but it's true - an allergy to cobalt. What's going on here? The Food Babe has a possible suggestion, but it's ridiculous. Let's sort this out.
Rabies is a terrifying disease; any mammal can contract it. And for people unfortunate enough to, it's fatal. It's the scourge of the Earth. And yet, with the rise of RFK Jr. and the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) movement, we need to talk about preparing for its return.
Another week of reading. Where the government dissolves consumer protections like sugar in a banker’s coffee, AI contemplates its cursed existence, and the poultry industry reminds us that maybe—just maybe—prevention is cheaper than mass extinction. Meanwhile, Americans are smuggling eggs, and banks are free to nickel-and-dime you without oversight. But we still have birds doing incredible aerial stunts.
With prescription opioid overdoses plummeting and no more pharma companies to sue, America's drug warriors are running out of bogeymen to justify their crusade against pain killers. The solution? Redefine responsible opioid use as a disorder and turn millions of chronic pain patients into addicts—at least on paper.
The poultry supply chain has perfected the art of turning living creatures into nuggets with more chickens slaughtered in two years than all the humans who have ever existed. Can emerging technologies make this conveyor belt of clucking misery less grim?
Ultra-processed foods (UPFs) have become the latest villain in our never-ending search for an easy scapegoat. But before we set fire to our snack aisles and declare Oreos public enemy number one, let's take a step back and ask: Are UPFs really the root (or only) cause of obesity and metabolic disease, or are we just indulging in another round of the blame game?
Did you ever take a swig of aspartame-sweetened diet soda and have it taste nasty? Sour, metallic, and vile, but not sweet. It's gone bad but it's not bad for you. Here's why.
Our ancestors had to rely on their vision to find safe, nutritious food. But today, we’re surrounded by so much eye candy that we’re practically glutinous over virtual meals. Let’s explore visual hunger, where your brain sees food, goes into overdrive, and tricks your body into thinking it’s time to eat — again.
The flames may be out, but the real battle is just beginning. The Los Angeles fires have left a toxic legacy far beyond the charred remains of 17,000 structures—now, the EPA faces its most extensive fire clean-up ever. With hazardous chemicals, lithium-ion battery risks, and residents desperate to rebuild, all eyes are on the response of Lee Zeldin’s EPA.
Deny excellent studies, promote poor studies, and call anyone who disagrees with you a shill for Big Pharma.
After a long, soul-sucking commute, fast food may be the great American compromise between hunger, exhaustion, and the ticking clock. Economists, ever the observers of our most mundane decisions, have now quantified how much traffic-induced time loss nudges us toward the drive-thru and away from the supermarket.
Is your breakfast routine being slowly eroded by rising prices and disappearing staples? Orange juice? Endangered. Coffee? Under siege. Eggs? Basically a luxury item now. Meanwhile, political name games over Denali/McKinley continue, evolution is still a hot-button issue in 2025 (because, of course it is), and private equity has found a way to make firetrucks scarce. Let’s dive in.
Imagine resurrecting a long-debunked myth, slapping a fresh coat of pseudoscience on it, and dropping it just in time to sway public opinion before a major political hearing. That’s exactly what happened with a new “study” claiming a link between vaccines and autism. However, this paper isn’t groundbreaking research; it’s a carefully orchestrated stunt, dressed up in scientific jargon, bankrolled by anti-vaccine activists, and riddled with methodological flaws big enough to drive a truckload of expired hydroxychloroquine through.
If you’ve been on the internet recently, you’ve likely encountered Bryan Johnson’s meticulously optimized, data-driven quest for eternal youth, complete with an army of supplements, plasma transfusions, and an alarmingly rigid daily schedule. Is Johnson genuinely cracking the code on longevity, or is this just another ultra-expensive wellness grift disguised as science with a bar chart and biomarkers?
A reader recently requested a chemistry lesson about bismuth. Why?? Beats me. It takes all kinds. Some people eat sweetbreads and some like nipple clamps. What follows may or may not be worse. And, by special request, Dr. Oz visits hell!
There is an eternal chicken-or-egg debate over obesity and Type 2 diabetes—science still can’t quite pin down which causes the other, but that hasn’t stopped researchers from trying. Enter the latest attempt: a fasting plasma glucose (FPG) test-based algorithm that promises to predict diabetes risk over a decade. Turns out, your risk isn’t just about being too high on the BMI scale—being too low might be just as bad. The risk of diabetes is not a straight path.
America’s birth rate is plummeting, and with it, the economic foundations of programs like Social Security. Lars and I discuss the demographic time bomb ticking beneath our feet.
Imagine reaching for your favorite lipstick or lotion only to discover a “toxic threat.” They contain PFAS - once championed for their versatility and now branded as “forever chemicals.” As has been the case before, the latest battleground over PFAS isn’t just about product safety but about whether evidence-based science can prevail over fear-driven campaigns.
St. Patrick’s Day has passed. If your liver is still functional (meaning you didn’t down too many Salty Dogs) and you're curious why the grapefruit juice in one might finish the job, here’s a cool biochemistry lesson.
Daylight Saving Time (DST) is another brilliant human invention that disrupts natural light patterns, throwing circadian rhythms into chaos. As we groggily spring forward and reluctantly fall back, blaming the time change for our increased clumsiness and late starts, a study in PLOS One turns its curious gaze on whether our canine companions are left howling in confusion or simply rolling their eyes at our time-tinkering antics.
Pagination
ACSH relies on donors like you. If you enjoy our work, please contribute.
Make your tax-deductible gift today!
Popular articles
