Search results

Could your trusty black spatula be trying to poison you, as some alarmist headlines fueled by a lawsuit and some dodgy science claim? Before you go Marie Kondo-ing your utensil drawer, let’s dig into the bad math, media hype, and the recycling controversy that ignited this unnecessary scare.

The latest CDC and FDA data shows that youth e-cigarette use (vaping) continues to decline. Oddly, leading anti-nicotine groups like The Truth Initiative are doing all they can to minimize the decline in youth use while ignoring adults who are trading their cigarettes for low-risk vapes by the millions.

As RFK Jr. gears up to lead the Department of Holistic Hoopla (formerly known as Health and Human Services), it’s clear that the wellness-industrial complex is no longer lurking on the fringes — it’s seated at the head table. Let’s untangle this mess of vibes, pseudoscience, and misplaced outrage before we all trade antibiotics for turmeric shots.

It's an unholy alliance of pseudoscience and selfie sticks. Nothing screams "trust me" like someone with a ring light and a promo code claiming their detox tea will change your life – along with your credit card balance. And let’s not forget: the only thing “natural” here is how naturally gullible their audience can be.

This week, despite the holiday cheer, I have been drawn to true crime – perhaps to avoid navigating the politics of family dinner. Between debates about the systemic costs of bullets, DIY ghost guns that make Ikea furniture look complicated, and the sorry state of crime clearance rates, I’m wondering if crime is the coal in our stockings. For emotional relief, I turn to eating, replacing the concerns about crime with Caputo 00 flour – a pizza offers a slice of optimism in a world that often feels half-baked.

What does it mean to be an expert in a world where credentials and experience are no longer enough to inspire confidence? The COVID-19 pandemic exposed the limits of traditional expertise, where even seasoned institutions like the CDC struggled to navigate novel and uncertain terrain. As the Great Barrington Declaration’s advocates step into leadership roles, we’re left questioning whether we’ve learned anything — or are simply swapping one set of flawed approaches for another.

As a dedicated AI user, I'm slowly learning about its capabilities. Then it became a literary critic, comic, and marital counselor. On its own. Insane.

This week we dive into a world where health insurers are more than just insurers, where nutrition labels aren’t simply about informing shoppers, and where “simple truths” are anything but obvious. These readings challenge the neat narratives we often accept at face value. So, strap in for a December 19th reading list that spans big medicine, big questions, and a bit of tongue-in-cheek Disney princess health hazards.

Should individuals with schizophrenia or other severe mental disabilities be trusted to direct air traffic? How the FAA’s blind allegiance to DEI initiatives puts ideology over common sense. (It is only one example of DEI running amok.)

The science community is in an uproar over the probability that Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., will head the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) in the second Trump Administration. How worried should we be about his nomination? Is the public health truly in jeopardy? Let's take a closer look.

If there is one claim that should irritate any nutritionist who values scientific evidence, it is the promise that hydrolyzed collagen can reduce wrinkles and visibly improve the skin.

Public goods create a peculiar dilemma: everyone likes the benefits, but paying for them is another matter. Economists call this the free-rider problem—people can enjoy protection, clean air, or herd immunity even if someone else pays for it. Attempts to solve that problem often introduce a less celebrated, increasingly vocal counterpart: forced riders, people who feel they are paying for something they never asked for.

Amid an explosion of aging research, there are plenty of “biohackers” out there jumping the gun without waiting for proof of efficacy.

Despite activist claims about trace amounts of glyphosate in foods like cereal, you'd need to eat absurd quantities- like 30+ bowls of Cheerios daily for over a year, before you approach the EPA's safe exposure limits. Sound realistic? Not in the least. Here are 5 quick facts about glyphosate scientists want you to know!

A class action lawsuit against UnitedHealthcare claims that an AI system was used to unfairly deny post-acute rehabilitation coverage for Medicare Advantage patients, sometimes overruling treating physicians' judgments. The case raises a bigger question: when algorithms make important decisions in healthcare, who is really responsible—the machine, or the humans who deploy it?

A short newsletter item summarized a new Canadian study into a simple takeaway: toddlers who eat more ultra-processed foods tend to develop more behavioral problems. The statement is technically accurate—but like many science headlines, it omits the context that explains what the findings truly mean. When the effect sizes and baseline scores are examined more closely, the story becomes far less alarming—and more interesting.

From miracle weight-loss fix to mass tort battleground: drugs like Ozempic and Mounjaro promise better health — but also spark mass lawsuits. So, are they a pharma bonanza, a plaintiffs’ jackpot, or both?

Why do some people get goosebumps from a song while others hear the exact same notes…and feel nothing?
New research reveals “musical anhedonia” — a real brain disconnect where music hits your ears but never reaches the reward center. It’s not picky taste, but a fascinating finding from neurology. Let's take a closer look.

In 1921, Otto Loewi woke from a dream with the idea for an experiment that proved nerves communicate using chemicals, not just electricity. By showing that stimulating one frog’s heart released a substance that slowed another heart, he discovered the first neurotransmitter—acetylcholine—launching modern neuropharmacology. His breakthrough transformed medicine, even as his life was later upended by the Nazis despite his Nobel Prize–winning work.

Few topics provoke as much concern as the perception that puberty is beginning earlier than ever. While synthetic endocrine-disrupting chemicals are often cast as the primary culprits, puberty is complex, and evidence from a large population study suggests that energy balance and inheritance may exert stronger, more consistent influences on pubertal onset than trace chemical exposures alone.

One year ago, Los Angeles experienced one of the most destructive urban wildfire disasters in its history. The fires consumed more than 55,000 acres, destroyed nearly 16,000 homes, and claimed approximately 440 lives — leaving tens of thousands displaced and entire neighborhoods altered. While debris was cleared in record time, the health consequences of burning not just forests but entire urban environments are still unfolding.

Words matter in national dietary guidance—especially technical ones. In the 2025–2030 Dietary Guidelines for Americans, readers are urged to prioritize oils “with essential fatty acids,” with olive oil, butter, and beef tallow offered as examples. But in nutrition science, “essential” has a precise biochemical meaning—and those examples don’t align with it.

Climate change plaintiffs now claim that greenhouse gases are causing property damage through fire, flood, and frost, ignoring the role of Mother Nature. Creative attorneys are repackaging these natural catastrophes as the consequence of the “nefarious” activities of alleged greenhouse gas polluters, such as oil and gas companies. Whether these cases will be allowed to be brought in state court before sympathetic juries is now a question posed to the Supreme Court.

There’s a difference between explaining science and dancing around it. When the question is basic immunology, the answer shouldn’t require decoding. A straight answer still counts. It was in short supply at the Casey Means hearing.

A study published this month in the Journal of the American Medical Association reveals that your daily caffeine fix might be doing more than just perking you up—it could be protecting your brain from dementia.